object x造句

• Additionally, object X ceases to exist if it gains a new part e.
• Each object x \ in U is assigned to one and only one class Cl _ t, t \ in T.
• C . This means that a span consists of three objects X, Y and Z of C and morphisms f : X ?
• Where each f _ t is a weak learner that takes an object x as input and returns a value indicating the class of the object.
• In other words, an object X composed of parts a, b, c, and d ceases to exist if it loses part d.
• The existence condition states " [ x, P, t ] exists if and only if object x exemplifies the n-adic P at time t ".
• For example, the position of an object x in the situation s is represented by the value of location ( x, s ), where location is a function.
• An equivalence relation on an object X of a regular category is a monomorphism into X \ times X that satisfies the interpretations of the conditions for reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity.
• Meaning that the physical object X, for instance a colored piece of paper, counts as Y, a 10 euro banknote, in context C, the Europe of the year 2010.
• Another interesting question might be to consider when given an object X, how the constants in the limit of a family of monics all with codomain X relate to the constants in each monics domain.
• Any of these will result in psychological balance, thus resolving the dilemma and satisfying the drive . ( Person P could also avoid object X and other person O entirely, lessening the stress created by psychological imbalance .)
• Statements about such functions can be given using equality : location ( x, s ) = location ( x, s') means that the location of the object x is the same in the two situations s and s '.
• However, if it is then said that object X is definitely owned by person Y, or definitely not owned by person Y, i'm having trouble adapting the probability equation such that it gives the correct answer for the remaining unknowns.
• An eigenfunction | w > for variable W related to object X has the meaning " suppose that you interact sufficiently with X, to the point of finding w as the measure of variable W, then X will be described by | w >.
• An analogical argument claims that because object X ( a watch ) is like object Y ( the universe ) in one respect, both are therefore probably alike in another, hidden, respect ( their cause, having to be created by an intelligent designer ).
• The smaller of two events in 2008, held at Concrete, in Birmingham's Jewellery Quarter, on 22 February, included an audio / visual performance from VJ Chromatouch and the genesis of the Object X team who created a series of interactive art installations.
• As examples one may think of model categories, that is, the full subcategory consisting of those objects X for which 0 \ to X is a cofibration . ( The bifibrant objects do not in general form a Waldhausen category, as a pushout of fibrant objects need not be fibrant.
• In the language of probability it is customary to call " random object X of the set S " any measurable map \ scriptstyle X : \ Omega \ to S from a base probability space \ scriptstyle ( \ Omega, \ mathcal F, P ) to S ( once a sigma algebra has been fixed in S ).
• Instead, Sellars emphasizes the need to dispel the myth by closely examining the  form of the givenness, dissecting the proposed operations of acquaintance in terms of  such facts as that physical object X looks red to person S at time t, or that there looks to person S at time t to be a red physical object over there .  ( Sellars)
• As a consequence of the antisymmetry, the fundamental category C of a pospace is "'loop-free "'i . e . for all objects x and y, if both homsets C ( x, y ) and C ( y, x ) are nonempty, then x = y and C ( x, x ) is a singleton.